Louisiana ’s carbon capture and storage (CCS) regulator has publicly rejected claims made in a recent report by Environmental Integrity Project, arguing that the findings misrepresent how CCS projects are permitted and regulated in the state.
The Louisiana Department of Conservation and Energy (C&E), which oversees Class VI carbon injection wells and is the sole permitting authority for CO2 storage in Louisiana, said the report contained misleading claims about safety risks and regulatory gaps.
C&E was established following an executive order by Governor Jeff Landry in 2024 and subsequent legislative reforms that restructured the state’s former Department of Energy and Natural Resources.
CCS has become a highly contested issue across central Louisiana and the wider state, as communities, local governments, industry, and advocacy groups debate the risks and benefits of large-scale CO2 storage.
Public town halls, community meetings, and proposed legislation to limit CCS activity reflect growing concern over potential impacts on groundwater, legacy oil and gas wells, and long-term liability for stored carbon.
Relevant: ExxonMobil Starts Up Second CCS Project in Louisiana with NG3 Launch
C&E said that the EIP report overstated risks related to leakage and legacy well integrity, arguing that these issues are already core components of its technical review process for Class VI permits.
The department maintains that each application undergoes detailed subsurface assessment, monitoring, and risk analysis, and that its regulatory framework exceeds federal minimum standards.
Officials also rejected claims that the public is excluded from the permitting process, pointing to public documentation, hearings, and community engagement as evidence of transparency.
Regulatory credibility versus community trust
The dispute highlights a broader challenge facing CCS deployment in Louisiana: building public trust while rapidly scaling storage capacity to support industrial decarbonization.
Louisiana’s geology and dense industrial corridor along the Gulf Coast position the state as a potential CCS hub for sectors such as LNG, refining, chemicals, and ammonia.
At the same time, local opposition reflects concerns over long-term storage risks, regulatory independence, and whether communities bear disproportionate environmental burdens.
As CCS projects move from planning to permitting, the credibility of state oversight frameworks will be central to unlocking investment and social license. The clash between regulators and civil society groups underscores how technical compliance alone may not be sufficient to address public skepticism around CO2 storage at scale.
Read more: Louisiana Lawmaker Proposes Bills To Regulate Carbon Capture Projects
